SentinelIQ logo
SentinelIQ
New: Behavioural Pattern Detection v2.4

Detect Insider Fraud Before It Happens

Every year, insider fraud costs Indian banks thousands of crores. Most cases are discovered 12–18 months after the damage is done; by which point it is too late. SentinelIQ watches every privileged user, every action, in real time. The moment behaviour deviates from baseline, investigators know.

View Live Demo →See How It Works
sentineliq.vercel.app/dashboard
SentinelIQ
Overview
Alerts
Users
MONITORING ACTIVE

Users Monitored

50

Alerts Today

7

High Risk

3

False Positive Rate

0.4%

Live Intelligence Feed
a3f9b2cJames SterlingBulk Data ExportCRITICAL94
b7d1e4fMaria LopezOff-Hours LoginHIGH78
c2a8f3dArun KapoorVelocity SpikeMEDIUM61

Average detection lag for insider fraud: the time attackers operate undetected

12–18months

Of all banking fraud events traced back to internal actors with valid access

30%

False positive rate on SentinelIQ's 3-model ensemble

0.4%

The Problem

Rule-based systems don't catch the employee who already knows where the cameras are.

Traditional fraud controls work on known patterns. Blocklists, velocity thresholds, static rules: they stop the fraud you have already seen. Insider threats are different. The attacker has valid credentials, legitimate access, and years of institutional knowledge about exactly how systems are monitored.

By the time a rule fires, the data has already left the building. SentinelIQ builds a statistical fingerprint of what each employee's normal behaviour looks like — and flags deviation the moment it begins, not 12 months later when an audit cycle finally catches up.

Privilege Escalation

Exploiting temporary permissions or misconfigured roles to reach systems outside their clearance level, often done incrementally to avoid triggering single-event rules.

Bulk Data Exfiltration

Anomalous download volumes compressed into narrow time windows. Often timed around resignation notices or performance reviews, when monitoring attention is elsewhere.

Off-Hours Access

Logins and high-value transactions at 2am from unfamiliar device fingerprints. Invisible to day-shift supervisors and nearly impossible to catch with manual review cycles.

Cross-Department Queries

A teller querying treasury systems. An analyst accessing HR payroll data. Each access might look legitimate in isolation; only behavioural baseline comparison reveals the pattern.

From Event to Evidence in Under 30 Seconds

50ms to score. Under a minute for an analyst to have a verdict.

1

Every User Gets a Fingerprint

SentinelIQ learns each employee's normal patterns across login timing, transaction volume, department access, and device usage over a 90-day rolling window.

2

Three Models. One Verdict.

Every incoming event is scored in real time by three ML models working in parallel. Isolation Forest catches sudden anomalies. LSTM Autoencoder detects slow drift. XGBoost produces the final risk score.

3

Investigators See Why, Not Just What

When a threshold is breached, SentinelIQ generates an alert with a SHAP waterfall explanation showing exactly which behaviours drove the score. No black boxes.

Your analysts shouldn't be the last to know.

Built for High-Stakes Detection

Production-grade ML pipeline running end-to-end on every event.

01

Real-Time Monitoring

Continuous behavioural event stream scored in under 50ms. Every login, transaction, and file access evaluated against a per-user baseline.

50ms latency
02

3-Model Ensemble

Isolation Forest for point anomalies, LSTM Autoencoder for temporal sequences, and XGBoost for supervised pattern scoring, combined into a single risk signal.

IF · LSTM · XGB
03

SHAP Explainability

Every alert ships with feature-level SHAP attributions from TreeExplainer. Analysts see exactly which behaviours drove the risk score.

Top-5 features per alert

Investigator View

When the score breaks threshold, the analyst sees the full picture.

Not a severity flag: a complete evidence package. Risk score, SHAP explanation, 30 days of behavioural history, and every linked prior incident for that user.

01

Event scored in real time

Every user action (login, transaction, or file access) is encoded into 8 engineered features and passed through all three models simultaneously in under 50ms.

02

Ensemble threshold triggers the alert

When the weighted ensemble score (IF 0.3 + LSTM 0.4 + XGB 0.3) exceeds 70, an alert is created with severity level, user context, and a frozen snapshot of the triggering event.

03

SHAP explains why the score fired

TreeExplainer runs on the XGBoost component and returns the top 5 feature contributions — positive values push the score up, negative values pulled it down.

04

Analyst reviews the full evidence package

The investigator sees the risk score, SHAP breakdown, 30 days of risk history, and all linked prior alerts for the user — then labels it TP/FP to improve future model accuracy.

Critical94

Bulk Data Export Detected

James Sterling · Treasury Dept · 2 minutes ago

Top Risk Factors (SHAP)

transaction_velocity_ratio+28.4
off_hours_ratio+19.2
access_entropy+14.1
login_hour_deviation+9.3
download_volume_zscore6.2
Isolation Forest
LSTM Autoencoder
XGBoost
SHAP
FastAPI
Next.js

The next insider fraud attempt is already in progress.

SentinelIQ surfaces it before the damage is done.

Get a DemoContact Enterprise Sales